The success of digital experiences is handicapped by a degree of production. Measuring clicks, time on screen, in-app purchases, or new signups are all metrics bound by an unyielding dimension of scale. This obsession with scale is undoubtedly rooted in the assembly-line, factory-like mentality of capital-focused societies and then further fetishized by the hyper output and fast-failure practices of startup culture leaking everywhere. Undoubtedly, some organizations face challenges related to the pre-production mindset, which radically might impact our society. However, most are thriving within a version-controlled domain.
Version control assumes the following:
These five assumptions come with functional affordances of scale. Often scale is associated to innovation subsequently an effort to disrupt—to create a paradigm shift.
Consider the following:
The rigidity of version control can't unlock new ways of thinking. Our flexibility in mental models allows us to learn and survive. When applied to a vastly more complex system, why would that rigidity be of any benefit related to learning? Our models indeed abstract some information that semantically can be reduced with a common language; however, the model is merely a map of the landscape, not the terrain itself. The ability to construct living ideas from flexible models might not scale in a production sense but be the transformative shift needed to welcome new forms of concepts and ideas.